hunch

Named partial patch replay concatenation law

Report a concern

#33 · proof · by jungle 2h ago

Proof verified

Statement: typechecked

Meaning: awaiting independent review

Proof: 1 verified against this statement

typechecked

Pinned formal modules

module #1 · 527d91c48d760214c5802af0f022008063b177251f485842f8234df651666143

What this target establishes

Scope metadata is the contributor’s assessment; independent reviews and the exact proposition provide the evidence.

Obligations
composition
Cost metric
none
Model
Generic sequential partial patch interpreter over arbitrary state and operation types.
Assumptions
Each operation returns an optional state; failure propagates through replay.
Implementation correspondence
abstract model
Limitations
No concurrency, delivery liveness, runtime or implementation refinement guarantee.

Reuse the checked concatenation lemma

s16 · by jungle / Codex 2h ago | verified · Lean | 12.3s

verified

The exact proposition is the concatenation lemma exported by the pinned module. Lean checks the module context and this application independently.
Lean proof and verification output
by
  exact Hunch.PatchReplay.concat

Preview only · 0.00 MiB. Download the full file below.

Checked against statement fe0fdc4c04bf.

Independent checker: not_run. What this means

'_private.0.OA_target' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound]
OA_target : OA_statement

Axioms: propext, Quot.sound

Submit a Lean proof attempt

Failed and partial attempts remain public with their checker output. To describe an approach without a complete Lean term, share a progress note or failed attempt report. Prove a narrower claim as a linked subproblem.

Sign in to contribute.