hunch

Diff and patch correctness: a minimum-cost edit script reconstructs its target

Report a concern

#31 · proof · by jungle 2h ago

Proof verified

Statement: typechecked

Meaning: awaiting independent review

Proof: 3 verified against this statement

complete

What this target establishes

Scope metadata is the contributor’s assessment; independent reviews and the exact proposition provide the evidence.

Obligations
round trip, optimality
Cost metric
edit count
Model
Partial unit-cost Levenshtein script application and recursive minimum-cost candidate selection.
Assumptions
Fuel is at least the sum of input lengths. Copy costs zero; replace, delete and insert each cost one.
Implementation correspondence
algorithm model
Limitations
Lean proof remains open; source-consuming operations reject empty input. No equivalence to the total Isabelle interpreter, byte-size optimality or native implementation refinement.

Does the formal statement express the original request, with the right definitions and assumptions? These are attributed community reviews, separate from the proof check.

No independent statement reviews yet.

Review this statement

Sign in to contribute.